Extended File Allocation Table (ex. FAT) is the successor to the old FAT3. What are the advanatages and disadvantages to this new file system? What are the differences between ex. FAT and FAT3. 2? When is ex. FAT preferred over NTFS? Microsoft released the ex. FAT file system with Vista SP1. The file system that had been rumored to be released with the original Vista was finally available to the public on a wide scale. Operating System: Windows 2000 Windows XP Windows 2003 Server Windows 2008 Windows Vista Windows 7: Windows NT.
Service Pack 2, the latest service pack for both Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista, supports new types of hardware and emerging hardware standards, includes all. Formatting will. Extended FAT — « This article will explain the issues that exist with FAT3. FAT has been designed to fix. Surprisingly to many people, ex. FAT even may be better than the much loved NTFS in some circumstances. FAT3. 2 is the file system with which most windows users are most familiar. Windows first supported FAT3. Windows 9. 5 OSR2 and increased support for it through XP. FAT3. 2 issues and problems –By default windows systems can only format a drive up to 3. GB. Additional software works around this issue. When formatted at these bigger sizes, FAT3. The maximum file size on a FAT3. GB. With DVD and high resolution DVD formats now available, this limit is commonly reached. Dealing with fragmentation and free disk space calculations can become painfully resource intensive in large FAT3. A FAT3. 2 directory can have 6. Each file or subdirectory can take up multiple entries; therefore, FAT3. FAT Advantages. File size limit is now 1. Format size limits and files per directory limits are practically eliminated. Like HPFS, ex. FAT uses free space bitmaps to reduce fragmentation and free space allocation/detection issues. Like HTFS, permission systems should be able to be attached through an access control list (ACL). It is unclear if or when Vista will include this feature, however. Obviously, ex. FAT has several strengths over FAT3. Then why In the past have most power- users of Microsoft systems have opted to format/convert to a NTFS file system instead? Interestingly enough, ex. FAT is not used and was not designed for formatting hard drives. It is only recommended in flash memory storage and other external devices only. This is why it is currently not considered a huge competitor to NTFS on hard drives. However, ex. FAT should be a true competitor to NTFS on flash- based systems with limited processing power and memory. NTFS on flash memory has been known to be inefficient for quite some time. Of course, only if your definition of “ideal” allows software to be proprietary and not open source. Vista will happily read FAT, ex. FAT, and NTFS from flash. Ready. Boost will not work with ex. FAT formatted flash drives in Vista, however. Windows 7 will read all three formats and can Ready. Boost ex. Fat flash drives. Modern versions of OS X after Snow Leopard (1. Fat read and write capabilities. In conclusion, FAT3. The simplicity of FAT3. The complexity of NTFS increases features but requires more memory and processing power.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |